Skip to content
HOPE  /  a charity in formation

Every child safety programme in the world
ends with the same instruction.

Tell someone.

There are at least 93 million children on earth who cannot. And there is an industry that has learned exactly what that silence is worth.

Launching soon

The part nobody says out loud

A child who cannot tell
is not a harder target.

He is the preferred one.

Predators do not choose at random. They select for silence. And sextortion is not a crime of confusion: the child knows exactly what happened, and who did it, and what was filmed. He simply cannot say it out loud.

That is not a side effect of the crime. That is the business model.

And then there is the part that should stop you. We spend years teaching disabled children to let adults handle their bodies. Every day, for entirely legitimate reasons. We call it therapy. We call it personal care. We praise him for cooperating, and we are right to.

We train compliance into him. Then we hand him a curriculum that says: say no.


The global evidence

This is not a feeling.
It is a literature.

93m
Children worldwide live with moderate or severe disability. The largest group of children on earth for whom the standard curriculum was never written.Jones et al., The Lancet, 2012 [1]
4.3×
The odds of violence for a child with intellectual disability. The less able a child is to report, the more likely it is to happen. That is not coincidence. It is selection.Jones et al., 2012. OR 2.88 for sexual violence; 31.7% prevalence in the 2022 update [1][2]
137
Reports of financial sextortion. Every single day. Up 37 percent in a year. Online enticement reports rose 158 percent.NCMEC CyberTipline, 2025 [3]
36
Teenage boys who took their own lives because of it. Not because of what was done to them. Because they could not find a way to tell anybody it had happened.NCMEC CyberTipline, 2025 [3]
50
Minutes. That is the whole intervention. One workshop measurably increases a child’s protective knowledge. Seven year olds still had it twelve months later.Cochrane review [4]; Safe Touches cohort [5]
0
Evidence that it frightens them. None. The objection that has kept this out of classrooms for forty years was tested, and it failed.Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [4]

Every one of those 61.8 million files was a child who could not tell someone in time.

You cannot moderate your way out of this, and you cannot arrest your way out of it. The only intervention upstream of the camera is the one that gives the child the words.


A way to tell

We will not deliver
this ourselves.

A charity in Perth cannot teach 93 million children. So HOPE is not built to be a provider. It is built to be a supply.

01
The child's version. The evidence based core content, rebuilt from the first line for children who communicate differently. Not the standard curriculum with a symbol stuck on it. Including a disclosure route that works when speech does not: a sign, a card, a page on his device.
02
The adult's version. Disclosure from a non speaking child is almost never a sentence. It is a refusal. A regression. A body that goes rigid at a particular door. We teach the sixty seconds after a child tells you, which is the most consequential minute of that child's life, and almost nobody is trained for it.
03
Openly licensed, permanently. A teacher in Nairobi, a service in São Paulo, a ministry in Jakarta can take all of it, translate it, put their own logo on it, and run it tomorrow. Without asking us. Without paying us. Printable, no device, no login. That is the point.
04
Measured, published, failures included. A ministry does not adopt a programme because it is moving. It adopts it because a peer reviewed paper says it works. The evaluation is not admin. It is the distribution strategy.

If a child is one day taught this in a language we do not speak, from materials we never got credit for, HOPE has worked exactly as designed.


Be there at the start

We will write to you once,
when it opens.

No newsletter. No campaign. One email, when HOPE is registered, the safeguarding is finished, and there is something real to join.

Which of these is you?

One email. Not a mailing list. Unsubscribe is a single click.

Before you give us anything, read this.

HOPE is not yet a registered charity. We are not accepting donations and nobody should send us money today. If anyone asks you to, it is not us.

Nothing runs until the safeguarding is finished. Working with children checks. A two adult rule that is never relaxed. A child safety officer who is not the founder. A complaints route that does not come through us. This programme will cause disclosures, and that is the programme working, so no child enters a room until we know in writing what happens in the sixty seconds afterwards.

And we will never charge for the curriculum. Not to a school, not to a government, not in ten years when it would be lucrative. Open licence from the first day, and it cannot be revoked.

  1. Jones L, Bellis MA, Wood S, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet, 2012; 380(9845): 899 to 907. Funded by the WHO. Pooled OR 2.88 (95% CI 2.24 to 3.69) for sexual violence; 4.3 for intellectual disability.
  2. Fang Z, Cerna-Turoff I, Zhang C, et al. Global estimates of violence against children with disabilities: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2022. 98 studies, 16,831,324 children. Prevalence 31.7%.
  3. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. CyberTipline Data, 2025. 21.3 million reports; 61.8 million files; online enticement up 158%; average 137 financial sextortion reports per day.
  4. Walsh K, Zwi K, Woolfenden S, Shlonsky A. School based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  5. Implementation of a Universal School Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Evaluation of Safe Touches.
  6. World Health Organization. INSPIRE: Seven Strategies for Ending Violence Against Children.

Every figure here is traceable to a peer reviewed paper. Where the evidence is weak we say so: the 2012 review is explicit that the underlying studies are heterogeneous and that better research is urgently needed. We are not going to overstate our case to move you.